Is carbon a calorie killer - and why is that a bad thing?

Is carbon a calorie killer - and why is that a bad thing?

You’re in a restaurant. You smirk, crack wise about being a hipster, then order the kale salad. Why? Because as cliché as it may be, you also know that kale is good for you. More than that, you secretly like it. It actually tastes like something, as opposed to the watery iceberg lettuce you’d get in the side salad. But then it happens. Your kale arrives and something is wrong. To your horror, it’s limp and translucent, just like the iceberg! Aaah! While this scenario hasn’t yet come to pass, there is some concern that it could.

More Carbon May Mean Less Nutrition

A couple of years ago, studies began popping up in the mainstream showing that certain staple crops, like rice and wheat, were becoming less rich in important nutrients such as protein and iron. One hypothesis is that increased levels of CO2 in the atmosphere cause plants to grow faster. While that might seem like a fine thing at first glance, the bad news is rapid growth might lower the concentration of nutrients distributed throughout the plant.1 It’s a fairly simple idea: a plant that grows bigger and faster with the same nutrients in the soil makes for fewer nutrients per unit of plant matter. Especially for societies where staple crops are the bulk of their daily calories, this would be a bad development.2

Grasshopper Dinners Are In Decline

Could we really see a drop in human health and wellness from a global change in how plants grow? More recent research suggests it might already be happening—with insects. By now, you’ve heard that insect populations are on the decline. The most prevalent hypothesis is that this is driven by pesticides and habitat loss. However, Ellen Welti, writing over at the Conversation, has another hypothesis to explore. She and her colleagues looked at grasshopper populations in grasslands and observed a disturbing trend. The decline of the insect seem to mirror the nutrient decline observed in the plants that they eat. This observation has lead Welti and her colleagues to formulate a new hypothesis: The plants that they feed on are turning into iceberg lettuce and the bugs are undernourished.3

It’s important to note that just because two things are happening at the same time does not mean they are related. As Welti points out, the other factors such as pesticides and habitat loss are undoubtedly playing a role. The nutrient decline that they are seeing concurrently might just be a coincidence. However, the very idea that plants might literally become less nutritious due to rising CO2 should give us all pause and, given the potential repercussions, it’s worth a hard look. After all, what’s the point of all this nutrition science and healthy eating if, in the end, we end up with no way to grow healthy food in the first place?


1. Millions May Face Protein Deficiency – Harvard

2. Rising Carbon Levels Threaten Diets Of Poor

3. Malnourished Bugs – the Conversation

This blog was originally published as What if Kale Was No Longer the Healthy Choice by Ohio PT Andrew Shaeffer on his Blog Reach Utmost on March 17th 2020. Andrew has kindly republished this article with us.  

Trees not Tees - please!

Trees not Tees - please!

Empty content. Please select article to preview